| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
We have big issues with the Nags inverted lolpenalty bonus. Sieging is broken with epic bumpage even more epic. In my little Hel today, I was in gang with a Leviathon, found myself missing 1million shields. every time i change session when im a s...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2010.01.24 03:23:00
|
2. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
other bombers have more shield/armor. thats why.
- by Kraken Kill - at 2010.01.23 21:15:00
|
3. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
and ive just got 6days left for cruise missiles 5. what a waste of time that skill was now, with 59k i would happily stick with torps on the nag. sigh :(
- by Kraken Kill - at 2010.01.20 20:33:00
|
4. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
naglfail is still underpowered. 7.5% per level bonuses please. Torps are just plain impractical for naglfars, the bumping and range factor on capitals means ive not yet been able to hit a single large tower with my torps since the release.
- by Kraken Kill - at 2010.01.20 19:58:00
|
5. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
the Devs said the reason why it HAS to be torps for fighterbombers and not a suped up turret weapon was due to turret weapons being more effective against smaller ships like BS and there not being an easy way of differentiating the damage able to ...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2010.01.05 21:51:00
|
6. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
this thread is getting rather full with non-MS pilots who want to make a ship they dont own into something they want everyone else to play. What is an MS? Its an Ewar Invuln Carrier, with more drones, more HP. costs 15b. What is a Super Carrier? ...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.12.28 21:01:00
|
7. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Kraken Kill on 28/12/2009 03:50:27 It looks real good. I guess main issues remaining really are the Hel's new bonus and a way for the hole created when in a shield bonused gang to be filled. Cant shields just be added like with arm...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.12.28 03:49:00
|
8. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
i quickly worked out that at 3k per torp damage- x20 bombers = 60,000damage. over 15 seconds ROF (what the bombers ROF used to be at least) = 4000 dps. taking into account the skill lvl, @ 20% per fighter bomber level, lvl 5 would be 8000dps. That...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.12.26 17:01:00
|
9. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
YAY CCP Abathur was FREED! - ON the Hel bonuses, the 5% per level remote rep amount isnt used particually much on a Mothership. The Nid especially with being able to traige can make use of all the benefits of 25% more rep, and with fitting many r...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.12.21 13:58:00
|
10. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Kraken Kill on 22/11/2009 22:43:23 the people who are coming in saying they dont see what the problem is with the proposed terrible changes... Read. Reducing the price is unacceptable. Simple as that. This ship should not be More a...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.22 22:43:00
|
11. Why is the Naglfar being nerfed CCP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
the Nags model cant support 3 turrets due to design issues, thats why originally they made it so the bonuses were more aimed at the 2 turrets and not at all at the missiles. The Nag will primarily be using Cruise missiles- frankly if a Rev at lvl...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.22 22:26:00
|
12. Why is the Naglfar being nerfed CCP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.20 02:30:00
|
13. Motherships Discussion -Post 'no-change blog' - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lets get this going again ast the last Threadnaught was closed in here. We NEED some form of EHP boost OR Titan Deathray immunity on Motherships. Also the Jump range needs re-introducing back to Dread Jump range. Just beacause you cant decide on...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.20 02:20:00
|
14. Mothership Jump Range - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Kraken Kill on 20/11/2009 01:59:43 I need to know how easy it is to jump it to lowsec to sell it or the ranges to use in escallations from the sites and annomalies!
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.20 01:59:00
|
15. Mothership Jump Range - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
With the -No changes to motherships mess- does that mean they will also lose the Jump range buff? Can someone confirm the worst for me, I already know inside that they wont get the extra range but on the off chance somehow- will they still keep th...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.20 01:48:00
|
16. Why is the Naglfar being nerfed CCP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Why cant a Dread that has 4! Dread weapons be the Dread which does the most DPS? why is it always the Amarr who do the most DPS followed by the Gallente? All minmatar dread pilots will need to train Citadel cruise now. uh why do i even bother pos...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.20 01:01:00
|
17. Why is the Naglfar being nerfed CCP? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It was not overpowered. At lvl 4 Dread a Rev still does more damage, only at lvl 5 does the nag pull ahead DPS wise.
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.19 01:21:00
|
18. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: HeliosGal pherpas a 50% modifer against non capitals for the compat citadel torps Its another fix to a problem which is the problem. There are no fixes needed if you roll back to the original design. Making lots of chang...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.15 09:46:00
|
19. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If you go back to the Original Idea for SuperCarriers You dont need to impliment further fixes. ALL of your suggestions only cause further imbalance and require more fixing. Lowering the price requires Fixing to BPO owners and current Mothership ...
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.15 09:10:00
|
20. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
you know whats next dont you... Carriers getting 5 drones only to balance the Supercarriers and Dreads doing half damage to balance carriers getting 5 drones :p
- by Kraken Kill - at 2009.11.13 17:51:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |